| ??? 05/23/09 22:05 Read: times |
#165559 - asm in Keil is not accepted very well Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
I'd say, this is a good deterring example for overly used C in places, where asm should be employed, to retain the level of control needed for what basically is a very low-level operation. I thoroughly agree I was told, asm in Keil is not accepted very well... Hopefully, you just misunderstood - I hope nobody actually said that! Keil has a perfectly good assembler, and Keil C51 is perfectly able to call assembler functions. The problem comes with embedding snippets of assembler source within a 'C' source file - so-called "inline" assembler. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| MSC1210 FlashCode Memory write problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| watchdog, interrupts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MSC1210 FlashCode Memory write problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know your chip, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Over optimisation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| case for asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asm in Keil is not accepted very well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to asm or not to asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Horses for courses. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not that it applies to THIS case ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |