| ??? 11/08/09 01:49 Read: times |
#170558 - I think so too but it doesn't Responding to: ???'s previous message |
at least with what i have used for AT89c4051.
I have read datasheet, it doesn't say anything about programming spec. like other brand at89c4051's datasheet shows. and yes I did sent email to manufacture SynMOS, I haven't got a response yet. so that's why I have turn to this forum may be someone has experience with this chip. I know datasheet has list of programmer manufactures, but like I said I only have few chips as surplus and I am not about to spend extra money for it, if that is case I will stick to AT89c4051 for few bucks. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reprogramming SM894051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you can't find the manufacturers website ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, come on! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so too but it doesn't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unfortunately | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP does not mean it's public | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why splitting hair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IPC for the LPC900 doc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and this is idiotic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Majority requests probably not affected by datasheet quality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe no PC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| writing to flash ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| empty chip too? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICP is not (officially) documented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICP and support | 01/01/70 00:00 |