| ??? 11/29/09 14:38 Read: times |
#171308 - A change of syntax... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
A change of syntax in the assembler selected to work with the old code does not change my assertion. It would take a bit more work to "edit" and "adapt" the source code but that that even strengthens the argument about how much code base familiarity is gained.
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I need help locating an old assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SXA51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Beauty of Assembler Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May have different mnemonics and operator orders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A change of syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-intel-ish assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: An Assembler ... uses a markedly different syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's the one I like, and it's MACRO assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Completely on subject example why even mnemonics may differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GNU as and '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |