| ??? 11/29/09 22:30 Read: times |
#171314 - non-intel-ish assembler... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... is used in the SDCC project. It was adopted from a multi-purpose assembler, indeed; however, I don't believe anybody uses it as a standalone '51 assembler.
But the sample presented here bears all marks of intel-complying assembler. Metalink's will most probably assemble it with no problems, although if it would be intended for that one, it would have most probably $MOD51 or something similar as the first line, defining the "standard" register names; but that's not really that a big difference. As said above, macros are different from assembler to assembler; and so are some other directives - I often run into troubles with the conditional directives, too. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I need help locating an old assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try anything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SXA51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Beauty of Assembler Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May have different mnemonics and operator orders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A change of syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-intel-ish assembler... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: An Assembler ... uses a markedly different syntax... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's the one I like, and it's MACRO assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Completely on subject example why even mnemonics may differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GNU as and '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |