| ??? 07/02/10 15:51 Read: times |
#177067 - emphasizing another factor Responding to: ???'s previous message |
while Michael touches the issue (and I am sure if you read his code it is there) one point should not be forgotten:
The switching of the code between boot app shall depend on no more than one bit (or TRUE/FALSE byte). I have seen "designs" where the switching is done much more comples and have managed to blow them all (neither boot not app would run) by creating "inconvenient power failures" Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| IAP / Dual applications and interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bootloaders Share Interrupts Like This | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily a good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hogworts..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting concept | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an added note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does the bootloader _have_ to use interrupts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forwarding of interrupts. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And for reliability... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Special Hardware Features Also Show up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emphasizing another factor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let me comment on that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yet another consideration with boot loader. | 01/01/70 00:00 |