| ??? 12/24/01 13:44 Read: times |
#18059 - catching all interrupts |
If I use RS232 communication on a system with -at least- one timer, one
of the interrupts (timer or serial) will be masked during other interrupt routine based on the interrupt priorities. This means that I can loose a timer interrupt or an wait forever for the TI interrupt. Making timer interrupt priority higher than the serial interrupt, and designing a robust protocol which handles data lost and timeouts may solve the above problem, but what if we have several interrupt sources? Say we have serial interrupt, external interrupt and timer interrupt(s). Is there a way not to loose the interrupts? Can we keep other interrupts on pending state during an interrupt routine? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| catching all interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: catching all interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: catching all interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: catching all interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: catching all interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: catching all interrupts- to Simon | 01/01/70 00:00 |



