| ??? 03/04/12 15:03 Modified: 03/04/12 15:09 Read: times |
#186412 - O.K. I get it ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I was curious about the nomenclature. I haven't dealt with these devices since the '70's, hence haven't kept up at all. The device on which I last encountered one was one which, indeed, required rezeroing in order to establish the location of the index each time it was powered up or otherwise reset.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| controlling an incremental encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| controlling the encoders? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Study time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Encoder is Feed back element | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Encoder is normally feedback loop... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incremental? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incremental contrasts with Absolute | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A small positive or negative change | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that absolute as well? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| trick question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| by contrast ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| O.K. I get it ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Even With Index | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single Track Absolute Encoders | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong sort of encoder! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Spammer | 01/01/70 00:00 |