| ??? 06/06/13 04:25 Read: times | #189874 - SS is needed Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| Mikkel C. Simonsen said: It looks like the SS is part of the programming interface. So why doesn't the 89ISP manual mention it at all? But I pulled it high with a 10k resistor. If you look at Figure 23-4. ISP Command Packet then I'd say SS is needed as a framing signal. ie It will not work left high. Check the programmer for a pin that behaves like SS, even if it is not documented. | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| Programming AT89LP214 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| easily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not so easy with an Arghmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How certain are you of the applicability of your cable? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct, ancient, cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Crystal needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SS is needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The secret SS pin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Secret SS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parallel ports are easy to find... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bugs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bugs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Size matters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with all this stupid stuff I would immediately ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternatives   | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you expect ... it's ATMEL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is ATMEL ... what do you expect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



