| ??? 03/20/00 15:27 Read: times |
#1900 - RE: why 8051/8052??????? |
hi craig,
no doubt you will now be (if not already) defined as the "resident expert"...nice chip all considered...here is a ? for you-my concern is that the chip can crash and if such an event (static dischg or ?)..occurs that the infamous page 160 could be inadvertantly written to, probably improbable but non the less--something must be in "edata1,2,3,4" anyway---what should be placed there if such a "inadvertant write to page 160" it would be innert..overcaucious is better...the offical responce from ad is "do not write to page 160"..so asked them already and the latest errata has workaround pending.. reg-jack |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: why 8051/8052??????? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



