Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/20/00 15:27
Read: times


 
#1900 - RE: why 8051/8052???????
hi craig,

no doubt you will now be (if not already) defined as the
"resident expert"...nice chip all considered...here is a ?
for you-my concern is that the chip can crash and
if such an event (static dischg or ?)..occurs that the
infamous page 160 could be inadvertantly written to,
probably improbable but non the less--something must
be in "edata1,2,3,4" anyway---what should be placed
there if such a "inadvertant write to page 160" it would
be innert..overcaucious is better...the offical responce
from ad is "do not write to page 160"..so asked them
already and the latest errata has workaround pending..

reg-jack

List of 6 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: why 8051/8052???????            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List