| ??? 11/08/13 16:43 Read: times |
#190105 - I'm using the SiLabs IDE Suite Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik. It doesn't have line numbers implicit in the source code window, yet happily refers to line numbers in its references. That's pretty frustrating. The disassembler window just uses raw addresses - that's not what I would call a 'source-level' debugger. Probably easier if you use C most of the time and don't much care for the individual instructions, but it really isn't in ASM. I've been using an excellent 25-year-old IDE and it gives me far more capability than this one. Unless I'm doing something very wrong, I won't be using it.
The Keil, on the other hand seems to have most of the capability I need, but the learning curve is really frustrating me. Dave |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil uVision4 Struggles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm using the SiLabs IDE Suite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs and ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you think it's possible... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| familiar editor and assembler/linker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC Resources? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use Keil ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lack of features... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what features? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| these.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| date/time and code checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dammit! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any symbol listing info ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OMF Conversion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No LST is unusual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F850 documentation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for SILabs chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| screaming and kicking | 01/01/70 00:00 |