| ??? 11/08/13 19:00 Read: times |
#190109 - Why use Keil ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
David Smith said:
3. My old system has the ability to plug a date/time and code checksum into the final .BIN. This means that I always run a full checksum on the application code as part of my POST checks, and can flag up a detected ROM error. Equally, the embedded timestamp is an automatic way of IDing code. Does the Keil linker have this facility? 4. I also can fill unused code space with repeating textfile, such as a copyright string during linking. Does Keil allow that? If you are only using ASM, why use Keil ? Does your present system export/create an intel OMF file ? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil uVision4 Struggles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm using the SiLabs IDE Suite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs and ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you think it's possible... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| familiar editor and assembler/linker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC Resources? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use Keil ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lack of features... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what features? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| these.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| date/time and code checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dammit! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any symbol listing info ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OMF Conversion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No LST is unusual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F850 documentation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for SILabs chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| screaming and kicking | 01/01/70 00:00 |