| ??? 03/10/02 00:47 Read: times |
#20670 - Time Bombs! |
I don't think it's a good idea to put time-bombs into projects. It just means that you will be associated with a "failed" part and no matter how you defend yourself you will be coupled with this "dead dog".
It's a lot better is any negotiation for recompense to demonstrate your "actual and ethical" completion of a task. Now you should insert some "signatures" that you can use the to demonstrate authorship. "EGO" messages are easily removed but "style" signatures aren't. regards, p |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Quote suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Quote suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Quote suggestion MORE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Quote suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Quote suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Define that, Erik: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: And what if, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Define that, Erik: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: And what if, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: And what if, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Defined, Erik: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Put it *all* in writing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Put it *all* in writing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fixed-price contracts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Evaluation model, how to: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Put it *all* in writing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Put it *all* in writing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To OMER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To OMER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time Bombs! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Evaluation model, how to: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Fixed-price contracts | 01/01/70 00:00 |