| ??? 03/20/02 21:37 Read: times |
#21040 - RE: bit array in C (for 8051) |
I agree that, while inefficient, there's no reason why a 'C' compiler couldn't handle arrays of bits. Pointers to bits would also be cumbersome but not impossible.
If the programmer really *needs* to do that then it's just a question of whether or not he's going to code a work-around or if the compiler will do the dirty work for him. In the case of many 'C' programmers I wouldn't be surprised if the 'C' compiler's library could do it more efficiently than the programmer writing the same code in 'C'. That said, everyone should use assembler! :) Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: bit array in C (for 8051) - Kapil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bit pointers in C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



