| ??? 03/30/02 18:40 Read: times |
#21276 - RE: laser range finding with 8052. |
Maybe eachoes are slower than echoes, but light travels about 1 foot per nanosecond. How many nanoseconds in a timer increment ? Too many to be useful. You better use an external counter, unless 200foot+ is all the resolution you need. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| laser range finding with 8052. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: laser range finding with 8052. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: laser range finding with 8052. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: eachoes ...... J. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: eachoes ...... J. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Modulation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Modulation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve, repeat that message. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve, repeat that message. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve, how is it done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve, how is it done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: laser range finding with 8052. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: laser range finding with 8052. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But for understanding purpose: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The link ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The link ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BUT ITS PATENTED REMEMBER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What other methods may be ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What other methods may be ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BUT ITS PATENTED REMEMBER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve have you used this method ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Steve have you used this method ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |