| ??? 05/28/02 22:15 Read: times |
#23556 - RE: Performance Analyser in keil |
erik malund wrote: ------------------------------- I have found that this method, while it will in most cases speed things up add an uncertainty factor. I would stay away from such a method only because of the uncertainty it introduces. I agree but in my case the discrete inputs come active for 300 to 500 msec. I think there is no chance of uncertainty here? do you agree ? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance improvement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance improvement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance improvement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance improvement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Performance Analyser in keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: To Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



