| ??? 05/03/00 11:17 Read: times |
#2439 - RE: a to d converter |
Hi Peet,
on using the 2051, parallel output was not a good choice. Since it occupy to many i/o lines (2051: only 15 available). If no fast speed needed, serial output was always better. E.g. the Philips PCF8591 need only 2 wires to the micro. Also I2C software can easy be implement. E.g. look at: http://www.specs.de/~danni/appl/hard/i2c/index.htm Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: a to d converter | 01/01/70 00:00 |



