| ??? 06/19/02 21:35 Read: times |
#24651 - RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 |
Kunal Kandekar wrote: ------------------------------- If you are thinking of using 3 address lines to multplex an 8-bit port, you are describing the working of an 8255 sort of port expander. Is that cost-effective? I think it would be better (and cheaper) to upgrade to an 89C52... REgards, Enrique. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051/Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051/Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051/Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: more I/O lines with 89c2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 |