Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/02/02 06:58
Read: times


 
#28387 - RE: uC/51 V1.00
Hi Juergen,

I HAVE READ THE DOCUMENTATION FIRST

But I nave not found any text,
which tells exact, if near always force to data and far always force to xdata and what memory was always used without a modifier.

And which modifiers forces to idata, bdata pdata and code.
You must support any memory area, which was available on the target.


Also since:

unsigned near char bit w1_bit_io( unsigned near char bit b );

failed and your 1-wire code use only char type, thus I assumed, that the bit type was not supported.
And I must use my own routines, since your 1-wire routine support not detection of multiple devices.


I want also no Keil clone.
I think only, its more clever to follow the syntax, which was well introduced over many many years, like the Intel assembler and the Keil compiler.


Peter



List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Free C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler - Juergen            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Free C compiler - Juergen            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: uC/51 V1.00            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List