| ??? 09/03/02 20:35 Read: times |
#28494 - RE: uC/51 V1.00 |
yes, I've read it. And I would like to refer to refer to Eric Malund's comment to your post!
If you simply try to convert an C file containing KEIL specific language extensions to uC/51 without a closer look, you'll hardly get an optimal result. Please READ THE DOCUMENTATION FIRST, until you criticize: I did NOT critizise anything, I merely stated from experience that working with a beta version creates some "people problems". Also, converting from another compiler was neither mentioned nor the issue. Please read the post as is, do not put things in that is not there. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Free C compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler - Juergen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Free C compiler - Juergen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: uC/51 V1.00 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



