| ??? 09/13/02 23:49 Read: times |
#29155 - RE: Hardware or software I2C |
I was in a similar situation not too long ago. The part only offered bit-level I2C which means it wasn't a matter of just writing a byte to the I2C buffer and forgetting it--I still had to clock out the bits one bit at a time. The code (available from Philips in an app note) was huge.
I had some problems that turned out to be hardware, but in the course of trying to resolve the problem I switched to a software approach and based my work on some I2C routines available on Peter's site. Once the hardware was working the code worked like a charm and was MUCH shorter than the Philips app note sample code. I never went back to the hardware-based approach. I'd probably consider it on those derivatives that support byte-level I2C where you can write out a byte at a time (like the UART). But when you have to clock out a bit at a time it just doesn't seem worth it. Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Hardware or software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hardware or software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hardware or software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hardware or software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hardware or software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 |



