| ??? 10/16/02 09:11 Read: times |
#30879 - RE: Faulty ISR??? |
I had posted the part of the code where i thought i had made the mistake. i assumed that the init was ok. but according to one of peter's post, from a very very long time ago, we need to inculde two reti's in case of a software interrupt. (something i wasn't aware of) i had one small doubt regarding this. the sp will surely change, so will the pc (on the execution of a reti) so where exactly should these reti's be included?
and one more doubt! is it ok to call, ret and then reti in an ISR? cheers, sushil |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Faulty ISR??? Part II | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Faulty ISR??? Part III | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Peter and Eric.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Peter and Eric.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



