| ??? 10/16/02 12:06 Read: times |
#30888 - RE: Faulty ISR??? |
Sushil Siddesh wrote: ------------------------------- I had posted the part of the code where i thought i had made the mistake. i assumed that the init was ok. but according to one of peter's post, from a very very long time ago, we need to inculde two reti's in case of a software interrupt. (something i wasn't aware of) ---------------------------- P.D. had posted: Conclusion: Execute a RETI to reset the interrupt logic. On using 2 interrupt priorities do it twice and on 4 interrupt priorities (e.g. at the C505) 4 times ------------------------------ sushil,as you see you need 2 RETI only when cascaded interrupts are possible.this happens only when multiple priorities are set. (//////////////////// )with apologies to P.D. regards pranav |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Faulty ISR??? Part II | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Faulty ISR??? Part III | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? Eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Peter and Eric.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Peter and Eric.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Faulty ISR??? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



