| ??? 11/07/02 00:38 Read: times |
#32094 - RE: pre & post amble when storing images |
"My thought was to burn it using a programmer."
In that case, why use EEPROM? Why not UV-EPROM, which removes any possibility of accidental electrical erasure? I dunno what the relative costs are these days, though. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: pre & post amble when storing images | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ESD flash corruption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ESD flash corruption | 01/01/70 00:00 |



