| ??? 12/11/02 23:09 Read: times |
#34288 - RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast |
Just to repeat an echo between the walls here.......the fastest way in one C compiler will most likely not be the fastest way in another C compiler. And it is possible that the code sequence generated by a particular compiler for one type of code context may differ for a different code context. For example you can get different code for...
if(x & 0x04) { ....do something... } .versus. (x & 0x04 ? ...do something... : ...something else...); Michael |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: assembler faster than C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte ... Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 |