| ??? 12/12/02 13:05 Read: times |
#34308 - RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan |
Andy wrote:
But if you're going to copy the byte anyway, why not copy it into a bit-addressable byte, so that the required bit can then be tested directly - without all that tedious messing about with masking, etc?! I, for one, would love to do so in some cases, how is that done in Keil C?. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: assembler faster than C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte Faster than Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Checking 1 bit in a byte ... Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Checking one bit, in a byte Fast | 01/01/70 00:00 |