| ??? 12/21/02 00:20 Read: times |
#34811 - RE: rotary encoder to micro ? |
The problem with rotary encoders is, that when the machine stops with the encoder exactly across a border (e. g. transparent/opaque limit in an optical encoder) You will, due to the unavoidable slack in gears, couplings etc get pulses at a much higher frequency than you ever dreamt the encoder could produce. I know of no micro that can keep up (I do not think a pentium could with the interrupt latency it has). Since every one of these pulses represent a direction reversal, not catching all of them will lead to gross inaccuracy. You need code it in a (C)PLD or buy the HP chip. a post a month or so ago listed the type do a search on 'encoder'
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? gray | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: rotary encoder to micro ? erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: rotary encoder to micro ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



