| ??? 01/05/03 23:18 Read: times |
#35725 - RE: 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC Steve |
Steve M. Taylor wrote:
------------------------------- How is the CPLD on power consumption versus the 82c55 ? That would depend on the CPLD... If it's low power you're after, use Xilinx' CoolRunner. There are, I believe, devices in Lattice's MACH family that have low power consumption as well. On the other hand, if you're looking for speed, there's nothing to beat the MACH4000 series. Be prepared to feed them, though... Rob. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89C52 and 82C55 PLCC Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 |