| ??? 01/22/03 16:19 Read: times |
#36953 - RE: volatile keyword |
Imagine ...
q = 0x00; while (q == 0x00); DoNextStuff(); A good compiler should remove this dead code section when optimizing. Although it is not what you want ... cause 'q' can be changed by an ISR somewhere else. At this point you should use the VOLATILE keyword. Bert Regards. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: volatile keyword | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
volatile keyword and not-so-optimizer | 01/01/70 00:00 |