| ??? 02/16/03 11:17 Read: times |
#39156 - RE: The new VRS700L Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael,
I agree with you. However, as you mentioned, I have to take care of the SP initialization as of the nesting level of subroutines and interrupts witch is a little unusual in a C environment ( of course not impossible but need a deep understanding of C’s libraries). To take full advantages of the VRS700’s facilities and still easily working in C, I thing a modification to the compiler ( or linker) must to be made . The user would have to use a switch or a pragma directive. Regards, Cristian |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: The new VRS700L | 01/01/70 00:00 |



