| ??? 02/25/03 01:40 Read: times |
#39981 - RE:40xx I<sup>2</sup>C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You know I wondered about this too. It is particularly odd considering that the circuit shown implements nothing but a 16 bit output / input scheme. Due to how it works it is not possible to use the circuit in conjunction with other standard I2C devices. In addition to that, this circuit strays from any semblance of I2C standards because it does not implement addressing and the R/W bit nor is it provisioned with the 9th bit ACK pulses.
When one realizes this you see that there is literally no advantage to this circuit over an SPI type scheme. Some may have thought, "Oh I can use my existing I2C bit bang driver software", but due to the non standard (a.k.a. non existant protocol) not even that is feasible. Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 / the Diodes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:40xx I<sup>2</sup>C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: RE:40xx I<sup>2</sup>C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: RE:40xx I<sup>2</sup>C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8255 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



