| ??? 03/11/03 20:27 Read: times |
#41303 - RE: Danger with NoTouch? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
3) I think "NoTouch" needs to have a version number or some qualifier so we can know which elements are being incorporated ... i.e. Level 1 - basic, 2, alternate boot vector, etc. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Danger with NoTouch? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



