| ??? 03/12/03 08:03 Read: times |
#41326 - RE: Programmer by Asim Khan Responding to: ???'s previous message |
so '89c51' is insufficient information to a peogrammer.
well, this programmer was designed only for ATMEL devices, so I presume that it should be AT89C51. But you are right, this incomplete part number does not provide any information about programming voltage (5 or 12) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pins of PC-4004-A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Pins of PC-4004-A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Pins of PC-4004-A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Programmer by Asim Khan | 01/01/70 00:00 |