| ??? 03/21/03 15:44 Read: times |
#42047 - RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Another old saying: You are not a *real* embedded systems programmer unless you have argued with someone about which routine is 'better' - the one that takes up one less byte of code memory, or the one that executes in one less clock cycle...
Another old saying: You are not a *real* C programmer unless you have managed to produce some totally obscure code that uses 100 times the memory and 100 times the clock cycles. I have worked with "real C" programmers and quote and two 'discussions'. 1) E: Put some comments in, I can not read your code. RCP: Then it will not be real C. 2) RCP: We need migrate to C++. E: That will require more processing power and the customers complain of too short battery life. RCP: what does that have to do with it. E: Clock speed and power drain is directly related RCP: What does that have to do with moving to C++. E: Shorter battery life. RCP: We still need to move to C++. E walks away. I hope anyone in this forum programming in C is an unreal C programmer. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Is the accumulator bit addressable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Embedded C Programmers | 01/01/70 00:00 |



