Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/05/03 22:28
Read: times


 
#42962 - RE: Kalpak
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The whole point of assembler is that there is a direct, 1:1 correspondence between the assembler mnemonics and the processor opcodes - so you always know precisely what code will be generated for a particular assembler source line.

As soon as you start abstracting to a higher level - eg, with algebraic notation - you remove this certainty, since there will very often be more than one possible way to implement an algebraic expression in the underlying instruction set; eg, there are several ways to implement the algebraic expression a = 0

So, if you value programmer convenience over deterministic code generation, why not just use a high-level language like 'C'?!

List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: hans & pranav            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Kalpak - Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List