| ??? 04/06/03 03:35 Read: times |
#42967 - RE: Kalpak Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Precisely what I said in my 1st posting about new efficient compilers. Which also BTW have become reasonably priced.
In a simple chip like MCS51 there are only a few such dual ways. And just like we by habit write CLR A but MOV B,#00H, one can very easily get used to algebraic assembly. Considering the fact in a small organization the main source of error will be the guy/ gal who wears more than one hat, a few coding uncertainities is a small price for code readability in assembly. Actually I went so as to implement a macro preprocessor for assembly because no preprocessor with cross assemblers supports the syntax identical to C. That helped even the newbies who worked for me. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| arithmetic operators-assembly language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: hans & pranav | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kalpak | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kalpak | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kalpak | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kalpak - Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kalpak | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language | 01/01/70 00:00 |



