Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/06/03 03:35
Read: times


 
#42967 - RE: Kalpak
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Precisely what I said in my 1st posting about new efficient compilers. Which also BTW have become reasonably priced.
In a simple chip like MCS51 there are only a few such dual ways. And just like we by habit write CLR A but MOV B,#00H, one can very easily get used to algebraic assembly. Considering the fact in a small organization the main source of error will be the guy/ gal who wears more than one hat, a few coding uncertainities is a small price for code readability in assembly. Actually I went so as to implement a macro preprocessor for assembly because no preprocessor with cross assemblers supports the syntax identical to C. That helped even the newbies who worked for me.

List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: hans & pranav            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Kalpak - Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: arithmetic operators-assembly language            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List