Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/20/03 15:42
Read: times


 
#46129 - RE: bitfields
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If you care, note that using bit fields for this type of thing is inherently non-portable. If it were me, and I wanted to hide the "ugly >> and &", I would wrap all of it up into portable field packing/unpacking macros, then I'd never have to worry about it breaking when moving it to another compiler or processor architecture. My $.02 USD.

List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
         RTFM!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: bitfields            01/01/70 00:00      
   See the Keil site.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: See the Keil site.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: See the Keil site.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List