Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/04/03 09:31
Read: times


 
#47480 - RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Raghunathan R wrote:
-------------------------------
"If you want a toggle every 256 cycles then the load and reload value is hex equivalent of 65536-256 which is 0xFF00. So I think you should load CMH2 with 0xFF and CML2 with 0x00."


I think that Compare Register CM2 remains steady and the T2 counter is incrementing,until CM2 and T2 are equal, then an interrupt is invoked...So by loading every time 0xFF to CMH2, I will still have to wait 65536-256=65280 cycles for the interrupt to invoke...
Am i missing something?
Giannis

List of 6 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: T2 compare or byte overflow in 80C592?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List