Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/30/03 13:29
Read: times


 
#49696 - RE: Problem solved?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
But with the lower supply voltage of LPC9xx you lost out a major design upgrade market(for cost and component reduction). ... you guys are going to loose out even more.
I do not see where the 3.3V makes "cost and component reduction" a problem. I know that some of us (myself included) have to be pulled kicked and screaming into the 3.3V parts. The fact is thet the smaller geometry of 3.3V parts allow for a cheap 2 clock part. I do not see the 89LPCxxx series as an 'upgrade' I see them as a part for new and exciting applications. The fact that they are two clockers is the interesting point and the 3.3V is something I can grudgingly live with. At leeast the pins are 5V resistant. Michael, you did not mention that the Cygnals are 3.3V devices as well.

Erik

List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
89LPC932 UCFG bytes            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89LPC932 UCFG bytes            01/01/70 00:00      
   Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Problem solved?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Problem solved?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Problem solved?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Problem solved            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List