| ??? 07/03/03 19:42 Read: times |
#50017 - RE: Works in simulation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
My problem is when someone with e.g. a timing problem can not understand that the simulator does not catch it<P>
Oh, I agree. Simulators are not the right tools for timing problems or many I/O issues. But I do think they can be useful for many *logic* problems. Before I go to hardware I like to know that my underlying logic is sound, and a good simulator can do a pretty good job assuring that. That said, you can't assume that because it works in a simulator that it will work in the real hardware. But barring timing and I/O issues it can give you a pretty good level of confidence when you first take it to hardware. Low-priced emulators such as the Cygnal devices definitely make it easier to test on real hardware, of course. Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Works in simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: BAS52 on Futurlec AT32 Plus V2 Board | 01/01/70 00:00 |



