| ??? 08/12/03 13:10 Read: times |
#52481 - RE: Reverse engineering (exception) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
.. Connectix made a different product (PC sw vs a box)
Still, they have reverse engineered the original product. The outcome of this case - and many other similar cases as for that matter - seems to point out that there isn't any reason to not practice the "noble art" of reverse engineering: give it a different shape and colour, and off you go! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering (exception) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reverse engineering (exception) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Reverse engineering (exception) | 01/01/70 00:00 |