| ??? 08/28/03 09:00 Read: times |
#53564 - RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oops, one thing should be clean:
- if you still need with many nested levels - do not use CALLs. Use JUMP and a variable where place return address in. In this case use JUMP (varibale) instead RET for return from subroutines. Here I mean variables in XRAM. It will look like software-made stack for return values (= |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: HELP ME! Stack space overflow ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about a State Machine instead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How about a State Machine instead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How about a State Machine instead? | 01/01/70 00:00 |