| ??? 09/23/03 14:58 Read: times |
#55232 - RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD Responding to: ???'s previous message |
so use a supervisor instead of the error prone RC
Sure, I do agree. Just pointed out the difference in case he wishes to replace the 89C52 with 89C55WD in the same board. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The spoon goes to ...! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89C52 and AT89c55WD | 01/01/70 00:00 |



