| ??? 01/04/04 18:02 Read: times |
#61908 - RE: ISR time shouldn\'t last that long? 1 sec Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In my opinion, a more conventional design would have the (very short duration) ISR generating events from the received bytes and those events driving one or more state machines in the non-interrupt code.
|
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ISR time shouldn't last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ISR time shouldn\'t last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ISR time shouldn\'t last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ISR time shouldn\\\'t last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| <<<No ball motions>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<No ball motions>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ISR time shouldn't last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ISR time shouldn\'t last that long? 1 sec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: <<<Read This First>>> | 01/01/70 00:00 |