??? 03/05/04 14:30 Read: times |
#66044 - RE: Radar Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raghunathan R said:
OK in such an event the only way out (?) would be a high resolution surveillance radar ? It doesn't need to be high-resolution - he only needs to know that there is somebody there. He merely needs to detect presence - not do identification. I dunno what's available in the way of such radar detectors (and we don't know where Azhar is based anyway) - but it could be possible that radar might be more economic than PIR over such a large area? http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=66032 |
Topic | Author | Date |
Monitoring Transpassing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Monitoring Transpassing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Monitoring Transpassing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Monitoring Transpassing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Monitoring Transpassing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Radar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PIR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: PIR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What you really want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What you really want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Changing requirements![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |