??? 03/08/04 14:39 Read: times |
#66248 - Not-so-mysterious errors Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sriharsha Vedurmudi said:
I feel, the Compiler writers at keil are put to many sleepless nights, and they rarely write a line or two with sleep chasing them Like Bartosz said, this is almost certainly due to misuse of printf, rather than any sleep-deprivation at Keil. See the section "Problems Using the printf Routines" at the back of the C51 Manual. As well as mis-use of the format-specifiers (as Bartosz said), mis-use of pointers is an excellent way to get really weird behaviour in any 'C' program. This is especially so in Keil C51, as an uninitialised Generic pointer can very easily trash the Stack: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=62905 |
Topic | Author | Date |
An Error in Kiel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: An Error in Kiel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: An Error in Kiel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: An Error in Kiel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Some mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Some mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: addendum to the above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not-so-mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Not-so-mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Not-so-mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Not-so-mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Not-so-mysterious errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:printf![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: An Error in Kiel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LX51: How will that help? | 01/01/70 00:00 |