??? 04/07/04 13:32 Read: times |
#68078 - RE: Dallas CRC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Peter Dannegger said:
There is no choice on using the Maxim 1-wire parts, since they generate CRC8 internally. Yes - but they're only using that specific 8-bit CRC to protect a 64-bit field, aren't they?! See Dallas App Note 27: Understanding and Using Cyclic Redundancy Checks with Dallas Semiconductor iButton Products: http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes..../542/ln/en On p8: "Because the amount of data stored in RAM can be large compared to the 8-byte ROM code, Dallas Semiconductor recommends using a 16-bit CRC value to ensure the integrity of the data, rather than the 8-bit DOW CRC used for the ROM." The point is that Ivan has already been told all this in response to posting exactly the same question on the Keil forum. |
Topic | Author | Date |
CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Dallas CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CRC question![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |