Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/07/04 13:32
Read: times


 
#68078 - RE: Dallas CRC
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Peter Dannegger said:
There is no choice on using the Maxim 1-wire parts, since they generate CRC8 internally.


Yes - but they're only using that specific 8-bit CRC to protect a 64-bit field, aren't they?!

See Dallas App Note 27: Understanding and Using Cyclic Redundancy Checks with Dallas Semiconductor iButton Products:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes..../542/ln/en

On p8:
"Because the amount of data stored in RAM can be large compared to the 8-byte ROM code, Dallas Semiconductor recommends using a 16-bit CRC value to ensure the integrity of the data, rather than the 8-bit DOW CRC used for the ROM."

The point is that Ivan has already been told all this in response to posting exactly the same question on the Keil forum.


List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Dallas CRC            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: CRC question            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List