| ??? 05/15/04 01:32 Read: times |
#70384 - RE: 51 without large SBUF! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dan B said:
I can try running it faster, and maybe, carefully, store bytes from SBUF as they come in _during_ the bit-banged routines... I've had to go through just this with a PIC bit-banging RF transmission at 100Kbps while handling other data sources. Bit boundaries had to be precisely positioned, so all code paths had to be instruction cycle balanced -- very tedious. If you have any choice, avoid it and use some (small) external hardware! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 51 without large SBUF! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 without large SBUF! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 without large SBUF! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 51 with large SBUF? | 01/01/70 00:00 |