??? 05/17/04 14:45 Read: times |
#70477 - RE: supervisory IC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Re www.embedded.com/story/OEG20030115S0042
I am a member of Jacks fan club, but in this he is missing one point: A runaway program can easily end up toggling a port pin and thus keep an external puppy alive. The better internal dogs (e.g. Philips P89C66x) 1) can not be disabled and 2) require 2 consequtive writes with different data not to bite. With such an internal dog it is much less likely (read impossible) to keep the puppy happy in runaway code. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: supervisory IC | 01/01/70 00:00 |