| ??? 05/21/04 16:59 Read: times |
#70869 - RE: MMU Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
AFAIK No MMU means no Linux. From the ucLinux site (link provided by Narasimha Rao): "uClinux is a derivative of Linux 2.0 kernel intended for microcontrollers without Memory Management Units (MMUs)." http://www.uclinux.org/description/ However, it boasts the following resource requirements as "much, much smaller than the original Linux 2.0 kernel:"
- and that's just the Kernel! Still not a job for an 8051 then |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 and linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Typo? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Typo? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MMU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: MMU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ...and then what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: ...and then what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the mind of a typical Linux geek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lynix? Linux? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Lynix? Linux? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It was Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conclusion and why Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Conclusion and why Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Dan Henry | 01/01/70 00:00 |