??? 05/22/04 17:23 Read: times |
#70957 - RE: WHY?! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Well I was looking for some operating systems for 8052 which can do the multitasking
To do multitasking (rather multiprocessing) on a '51 gang a bunch of them and let then each run a task and then let them taks on e.g. IIC. Running multiple tasks on a '51 is asking a pony to carry the worlds heaviest person. Yes, multitasking OSs are available for the '51 e.g. CMX and the whole purpose of using a microcontroller as opposed to a microprocessor is lost. The fact that a number of individuals want to do the wrong thing does, of course, make a business opportunity for someone to provide the tools. The '51 is exceptionally good for what it is intended for, trying to make it do something else is bad design. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 and linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Typo? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Typo? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: MMU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: MMU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ...and then what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: ...and then what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the mind of a typical Linux geek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 and Lynix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lynix? Linux? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Lynix? Linux?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It was Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: WHY?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Conclusion and why Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Conclusion and why Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Dan Henry | 01/01/70 00:00 |